Mindfly Website Design Studio

Mindfly Web Designer Favorite

Blog

Our Posts on Web Design

Steve Krug Hits the Mark with His New Book

by heather alvis February 8, 2010 7:49 AM

Steve Krug's new book "Rocket Surgery Made Easy" is a helpful sequel to his first book "Don't Make Me Think". He describes the specifics of administering usability studies with details that I have been wondering about ever since I started thinking about adding usability to Mindfly's services. The book is written with the same writing style as his first book with bits of good humor sprinkled throughout - keeping the content light and readable yet highly informative. He offers scripts for the test administrator to follow and helpful checklists of "to-dos" prior to and following the testing sessions. One of the chapters even points out the most common problem with websites in general; not having a clear focus on the home page and a "call to action" for the user. Oftentimes the home page tries to display too much information and the users get lost before they even get started.

Steve Krug's New Book I'd recommend this book to anybody that is planning on starting a web project, whether it is a redesign or a brand new site. One important concept I got from the book is that testing users isn't rocket science or brain surgery (or rocket surgery), and with the tips and tricks in this book, you can do some form of testing right now without anything fancy. There are many more sophisticated usability tests you can do, but for the budget and time-conscious small business owner, there is still a way to test and get beneficial results. The second important concept I hope my clients would take away is that a web design should be made to help your users and not you - the business owner. Knowing your audience is critical when it comes to making design and content decisions. Your site should be designed to help your users find the information they are looking for -which is hopefully the information you want them to find - and to do so without having to think about it.

When making design decisions, it makes sense to have some data - not theoretical data, but real user data, which you can get just by watching someone. For example, if you offer classes as your main income generator, make sure your users can tell in the first 5 seconds of looking at your site. Show the schedule in a highlighted box with a button that says "click me" visually - write it out in big letters - give them more than one way to get to the class sign-up or description page. If you offer recipes as a side-service, keep it accessible, but don't use precious home page real estate to draw attention to them if the recipes aren't your focus (or they don't bring you any income). Added value services can be resources or footer material that users can find once they've been converted to customers. When you do your user test, see if your neighbor can find the page to sign up for a class. Watch the buttons he clicks on, have him tell you what he's thinking. You might be surprised to find that he didn't think at all the same way you do. Then test with your mom or dad or grandmother - if you dare - but as with any science experiment, don't think you have to fix every problem your mom or 10-year old nephew run into. Hopefully you'll find some similarities among the user experiences and find the problems that tend to affect the most people; fix those first.

Designing sites for small businesses lends itself to budget concerns especially when it comes to usability studies. Most of my clients, say 100% of them, have never heard of usability studies. They've never considered watching someone use their site for the sake of determining whether or not it works. Small business owners know they need a new site design - because it looks outdated, but rarely do they think they need revamping because their users are confused. If more of our clients read either of Krug's books, we wouldn't have to convince them that their site should focus on the user experience. Maybe we'd even have a few people request a usability study as part of their project. Krug's books are compelling, they make sense, and they make testing sound straightforward enough that anyone can do it. After reading, you say to yourself "Of course I need to do this for my website! Why wouldn't I? Let's do it today." Unfortunately, more times than not, life gets in the way; it's Monday morning, you open the door to your store, customers come in, you answer the phone, and the work week (or the company bottom line) takes precedence over your weekend good intentions of hiring someone to do a usability study on your site.

If you don't have the budget, or even if you do, spend the $35 on this book. Krug shows you what is really done behind the scenes. You can modify his ideas and do usability studies on your own. They won't be the same as the official studies a professional organization can do, but at least it is something, a step in the right direction. The bottom line is anything - any form of a usability study - is better than nothing. If you don't have the recording software, you can still do it - you just need someone to use your site while you watch them. If they don't see that button to sign up, or if they can't find that article you wrote last week without using the search, but they did find the newsletter sign-up link, you've got some usable data to work with. Once you have this data, your designer (or you) can start making educated decisions about what needs work on your site.

By all means, if you don't have the time, but you do have some cash, ask your web designer about usability studies - is it a service they provide? If so, have them do one and see what they find. You might find that your site is as clear and informative as you think it is. Chances are, however, that they'll come back with some recommendations - a design tweak or two that could make a big difference for the success of your site. Testing is an ongoing process, but remember, the goal is always the same - to turn more of your users into customers.

Tags:

Categories: Usability

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

In Which Two Heroines Explore Content Strategy

by Theresa Carpine January 29, 2010 10:11 AM

After six months of Refresh Bellingham, I was very excited to attend a "meetup" event with Maya Belka that was a bit more applicable to the work I do here at Mindfly. This week, we trekked down to Seattle to find out more about the content strategy movement that's gaining recognition in the web industry.

Content Strategy: Seattle

One of the leading voices of content strategy, Kristina Halvorson of Brain Traffic, defines the practice as "plans for the creation, publication, and governance of useful, usable content" ("The Discipline of Content Strategy"). In her book Content Strategy for the Web, she specifically outlines changing the process of how websites are planned and executed.

A primary concern for content strategists is that after a website has been designed and coded and polished, the content—the meat of most websites—is finally inserted into the site. Whether it is text, images, or multi-media, if the designers don’t know what to expect in terms of content, the overall aesthetic of the website can get thrown off.

So before the design is even considered, a content strategist wants to know "What's your overall goal?" Once a goal is established (usually to increase profits or gain customers), the next question is "Why?" Why do you want an image rotator of your four dogs on your website? (Are you selling dogs? Are you selling dog products? Is it "meaningful" to your audience?) If the "why" isn't directly related to the goal, a content strategist will help you figure out what content will help you reach your goal.

Content Strategy: Seattle

Content Strategy: Seattle was founded in October of 2009 by web writer James Callan. On Wednesday, January 27, 2010, a group of about 16 individuals in the web industry (writers, editors, information architects, and, yes, even an actual content strategist) gathered at Vermillion Art Gallery Wine Bar to try to figure out "What is Content Strategy?"

While we didn't figure out everything that it is, we at least established what it's not. It's not simply a collection of tactics, as Halvorson reminded us in a recent blog post ("Content Strategy: More Than a Bunch of Tactics"). According to Halvorson, tactics, combined, do not equal a strategy. Rather, a strategy makes the tactics make sense, giving them a specific purpose in the process.

We also discussed that the growing importance on usability (or, at least, the acceptance among clients that investing in usability and usability testing can help make a website better) is a helpful "selling point" for content strategy. Like usability testing, content strategy is something that has to begin before a tangible product (as tangible as a two-dimensional website on your computer screen can be) is created. It's an investment with long-term benefits, not a quick-fix to improve site rankings after the fact.

Both Maya and I are excited to continue to learn more with the Content Strategy: Seattle community at upcoming events, including Operation Halvorson on April 6, 2010, in which Halvorson graces us with her presence and wisdom during her Seattle visit for An Event Apart. Stay tuned!

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed